Sustainability

Environment

Homechevron_rightSustainabilitychevron_rightenvironment

Initiatives to Address Climate Change

MEDIUS Guided by our corporate philosophy of “Contributing to Community Healthcare” and our sustainability philosophy of “Act today for a better tomorrow,” the Group is actively working to reduce its environmental impact in order to achieve both a sustainable society and corporate growth.Building on a foundation of legal compliance, we are advancing efforts to address global warming, promote resource recycling, and establish an environmental management system, while striving for continuous improvement through education and information disclosure. We aim to achieve harmony between our business activities and the global environment, and we will act as a responsible corporation.

View Our Environmental Policy

Priority Areas

01

Legal compliance

We will strictly comply with environmental laws and regulations and fulfill our environmental responsibilities.

02

Act on global warming

We will work to identify and reduce greenhouse gas emissions in order to mitigate the effects of global warming.

03

Implement measures to establish a circular economy

We are working to track and reduce waste and promote the recycling of resources.

04

Establishment of an environmental management system

In order to systematically advance our environmental efforts, we will establish and operate an Environmental Management System (EMS) and strive for continuous improvement.

05

Promoting environmental education and activities

We are committed to environmental education and activities to deepen understanding of environmental issues and encourage sustainable behavior.

06

Information disclosure and continuous improvement

We will disclose the results and progress of our environmental activities and make continuous improvements through evaluation and review.

Organizational Structure and Governance

To integrate ESG aspects into our management strategy and practice sustainable management from a long-term perspective, we established a Sustainability Committee in June 2023.
The committee meets quarterly and is chaired by President and CEO Medius Holdings Co., Ltd., who is responsible for climate change response. It is composed of members including Director responsible for sustainability (who also serves as the Executive Committee Chair), other executive officers, and expert committee chairs. The committee is responsible for identifying key sustainability issues, formulating strategies and targets, managing and evaluating the progress of measures, and overseeing their implementation across the entire group.
Regarding climate change in particular, a specialized committee, the Social Coexistence Committee, has been established. The findings from each department are compiled and reported to the Board of Directors through this committee.
The Board of Directors oversees the executive team's efforts regarding climate change and provides feedback to the Sustainability Committee.

Strategy

The Analysis Process

Based on the risk and opportunity items outlined in the TCFD recommendations, we examined the risks and opportunities that climate change poses to our group's business in the following steps.

Furthermore, we conducted analyses of policy and market transitions (transition risks and opportunities) and physical changes due to disasters, etc. (physical risks and opportunities) using two scenarios: a 1.5°C scenario and a 4°C scenario.

STEP 1: Identify and Assess Risks and Opportunities; STEP 2: Define Scenarios; STEP 3: Assess Financial Impact; STEP 4: Consider Countermeasures

Climate Change Scenarios

This scenario aims to limit the global average temperature to below 1.5°C compared to pre-industrial levels, as efforts to achieve carbon neutrality in order to mitigate the impacts of climate change become more active.
In the 1.5°C scenario, the impact of policy and regulatory risks within the transition risks is assumed to be greater than in the 2°C scenario.

1.5°C Scenario (Decarbonization Scenario)

This scenario aims to limit the global average temperature to below 1.5°C compared to pre-industrial levels, as efforts to achieve carbon neutrality in order to mitigate the impacts of climate change become more active.
In the 1.5°C scenario, the impact of policy and regulatory risks within the transition risks is assumed to be greater than in the 2°C scenario.

4°C Scenario (High-Emissions Scenario)

This scenario assumes that no progress will be made in climate change countermeasures, and that the global average temperature will rise by approximately 4°C by the end of this century compared to pre-industrial times. It is anticipated that the impacts of physical risks such as more severe extreme weather and rising sea levels will become greater.

Changes in Global Average Temperature Based on the 1850–1900 Reference Period

Graphs of the 4°C Scenario and the 1.5°C Scenario

Evaluating the Impact of Risks and Opportunities and Selecting Countermeasures

In the 1.5°C scenario, external pressure to decarbonize will intensify, leading to a world view in which energy-saving equipment and environmentally friendly products are selected in the medical field, and we recognize that low-carbon products and our own emissions reduction activities will have an impact on improving corporate value. On the other hand, in the 4°C scenario, low-carbonization and decarbonization will not be promoted, CO2 emissions will tend to increase, abnormal weather and disaster risks will increase, and business activities may be affected by supply chain disruptions.

Risks Affecting the Business

RiskClassificationDriverRisk detailsTimelineImpact
Migration
Risks
Legal regulations
policy
Introduction of carbon pricing
Soaring carbon prices
For our company's emissions (Scope 1–2),
costs are incurred
Mid-termLarge
Costs associated with energy conservation and the adoption of renewable energy will be incurred in order to comply with stricter GHG emission regulations.Short-term
to medium-term
Large
TechnologyRenewable Energy
Increase in Renewable Energy Sources
Electricity rates will increase as a result of changes in the power generation mix.Mid-termMedium
Physics
Risk
acuteIncreasing severity of natural disastersDue to damage to our facilities, we expect a decrease in revenue and an increase in costs resulting from the impact on inventory and the suspension of operations.Short-term
to medium-term
Large
Disruption of logistics networks will increase delivery costsShort-term
to medium-term
Large

Opportunities that Impact the Business

OpportunityClassificationDriverOpportunity DetailsTimelineImpact
OpportunityMarketExpansion of the digital transformation marketDemand for digital health solutions is increasing as healthcare organizations undergo digital transformation.Short-term
to medium-term
Large
ResilienceDecarbonization Initiatives
Strengthening
Highlighting decarbonization efforts will improve our external reputation and reduce our funding costs.Mid-termLarge
Resource EfficiencyPromotion of the
Promotion of the Adoption of Energy-Efficient Products
Operating costs are reduced by introducing energy-efficient equipment at business locationsShort-term
to medium-term
Medium
Energy SourceRenewable Energy
Introduction of Renewable Energy Sources
The introduction and expansion of solar power generation and energy storage technologies will reduce electricity purchase costs.Mid-termMedium

*Time Horizon: Short-term: Within 3 years; Medium-term: 3–10 years; Long-term: 10–30 years
*Impact: High: 1 billion yen or more; Medium: 300 million to 1 billion yen; Low: Less than 300 million yen

Risk Management

The Process for Identifying and Assessing Climate-Related Risks

Climate change risks are identified and evaluated by the Sustainability Committee through each business division, the Social Coexistence Committee, and the Risk Committee. The Risk Committee evaluates once every six months, and in the future will evaluate the impact on finances and urgency as priority evaluation items. Risks that are deemed to be particularly important as a result of the evaluation will be reported to the Board of Directors through the Sustainability Committee as necessary.

Process for Managing Climate-Related Risks

The identified and evaluated risks are coordinated with the Risk Committee, which is responsible for risk management for the entire company, to build a company-wide integrated risk management system. The countermeasures considered by the Risk Committee are reported to the Board of Directors via the Sustainability Committee, after which they are discussed and considered by the Board of Directors and notified to the relevant group companies.

Classify risks as general, significant, or critical, with those having high urgency and high impact designated as critical risks

Integration Process for Company-wide Risk Management

Our group has established a "Risk Committee" as one of the expert committees of the Sustainability Committee. The Risk Committee meets once a quarter and is part of a system for managing risks across the entire group.
The Risk Committee aggregates and scrutinizes important risks that have been evaluated, analyzed, and reported by various committees, including the Compliance Committee, cross-group committees (such as the Information Systems Committee, Human Resources Committee, and General Affairs Committee), and expert committees of the Sustainability Committee (such as the Social Coexistence Committee and the Human Capital Committee). It then reports these findings to the Board of Directors in cooperation with the Sustainability Committee. Climate-related risks are also managed as integrated company-wide risks through collaboration between the subcommittees of the Social Coexistence Committee and the Risk Committee.

Indicators and Goals

To assess and manage the impact of climate-related issues on our business operations, our Group began calculating greenhouse gas emissions (Scopes 1–3) in fiscal year 2022 (July 2022–June 2023) in accordance with the GHG Protocol standards, andand we also conducted these calculations for fiscal year 2023 (July 2023–June 2024). Regarding the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, we have set a target for our Group to reduce Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 42% from the fiscal year 2022 baseline by fiscal year 2030.Going forward, we will work to reduce greenhouse gas emissions not only within our Group but also across our entire supply chain.

Fiscal Year 2023 Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Scope 1–3)

ScopeScope 3 CategoriesEmissions (t-CO2)
Scope1+2
total
10,133
Scope 17,124
Scope 23,009
Scope 31 Purchase1,380,365
2. Capital goods4,837
3. Other fuels2,034
4. Transportation (upstream)1,666
5. Waste143
6. Employee Business Travel441
7 Employee commuting1,044
11 Use of the Product213,174
12 Product Disposal81
Scope 3 total1,603,786
total1,613,919

*Scope 3: 8 Leased assets (upstream), 9 Transportation (downstream), 10 Product processing, 13 Leased assets (downstream), 14 Franchises, and 15 Investments are not included in the calculation as they are not related to our business.

Graph of Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Scope 1–3) for Fiscal Year 2023